С��Ƭ��Ƶ

Why is С��Ƭ��Ƶ conducting an Engagement & Well-Being Survey?

• The campus climate at С��Ƭ��Ƶ shapes the lives of all of us - students, staff, and faculty. Understanding deeply the varied experiences of our community is a critical part of continuing to improve how we work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable campus environment. That is the goal of the С��Ƭ��Ƶ Engagement & Well-Being Survey.
• The idea to conduct an engagement and well-being survey assessment originated from senior leaders who believed data from such a survey might be useful in planning for the future and improving the environment for students, faculty, and staff at С��Ƭ��Ƶ.
• This qualitative and quantitative research effort will allow us to better understand the experiences of our community. We know from the research that thriving campus climates contribute directly to overall success for students, staff, and faculty. This information will help us better understand how members of the staff community experience their environment. This is an opportunity for you to ensure your voice is part of this effort.
• We seek a campus climate grounded in mutual respect, nurtured by dialogue, and evidenced by a pattern of civil interaction. We actively foster an environment characterized by openness, fairness, and equal access for all students, staff, and faculty.
• Therefore, the question we are asking ourselves is: How can С��Ƭ��Ƶ collect actionable data to ensure we are a community environment that respects community member’s individual needs, abilities, and potential?
• Ensuring inclusive and equitable campus experiences for all members of the С��Ƭ��Ƶ community requires us to deeply listen and understand these often disparate experiences.
• A transparent, holistic, and confidential assessment is an important opportunity to engage, learn, and act to further enhance the С��Ƭ��Ƶ community experience.

What is “Engagement” and why is it important?

• Engagement is defined as experiences that are demonstrated by how students, faculty, and staff think, feel, and act, as well as how they feel about С��Ƭ��Ƶ's environment and policies, which influence how they feel toward the organization.
• It is well researched that community engagement influences the levels to which student, faculty and staff members thrive. For example, when staff feel they have a “sense of engagement,” they report higher levels of perceived sense of purpose, motivation, and enthusiasm. They have a positive mental and emotional state, leading to higher job satisfaction, reduced stress levels, and improved overall health. 

What happens as a part of the Engagement & Well-Being Survey?

• In Spring and Summer 2024, we will develop the survey and submit our IRB proposal.
• In September-October 2024, we will administer the campus-wide survey.
• Behind the scenes, our consultant, Rankin Climate, will also be analyzing our institutional policies and procedures.
• In November-December 2024, we will conduct data analysis and begin to develop the report.
• Results will be presented in March 2025, and those will be the start of our Action Planning so that the lessons we learn throughout the process can be acted upon.

How are the questions developed?

• Rankin Climate, our consultant, developed a repository of tested questions from administering climate assessments at more than 300 institutions across the nation. Rankin Climate also administered the 2017 Campus Climate Assessment at С��Ƭ��Ƶ that led to many positive initiatives. To assist in contextualizing the survey for С��Ƭ��Ƶ, and to capitalize on the many assessment efforts already undertaken, the CSWG was formed. The committee is responsible for developing the survey questions. The team will review selected survey questions from the 2017 survey and the consultant’s 2024 tested collection.

Why do some demographic questions contain a very large number of response options?

• It is important in staff engagement and well-being research for survey participants to “see” themselves in response choices to prevent “othering” an individual or an individual’s characteristics. Some researchers maintain that assigning someone to the status of “other” is a form of marginalization and should be minimized, particularly in campus climate research which has an intended purpose of inclusiveness. Along these lines, survey respondents will see a long list of possible choices for many demographic questions. However, it is reasonably impossible to include every possible choice to every question, but the goal is to reduce the number of respondents who must choose “other.”

Why is this a population survey and not a sample survey?

• The survey will be administered to all staff at С��Ƭ��Ƶ. Climate exists in micro-climates, so creating opportunities to maximize participation is important as well as maximizing opportunities to reach minority populations. Along these lines, the consultant has recommended not using random sampling as we may “miss” particular populations where numbers are very small (e.g., Native American staff). Since one goal of the project is inclusiveness and allowing invisible “voices” to be heard, this sampling technique is not used. In addition, randomized stratified sampling is not used because we do not have population data on most identities. For example, С��Ƭ��Ƶ collects population data on gender identity and racial identity, but not on disability status or sexual identity. A sample approach could miss many groups.

What is the response rate goal?

• The target participation in the survey is all students, faculty, and staff at С��Ƭ��Ƶ. Every response matters and is valuable in providing the most beneficial feedback and results.

What will be included in the final summary reports?

• The consultant, Rankin Climate, will provide a key findings summary of the most salient findings from the results. The report will provide high-level summaries of the findings and will identify themes found in the data. Generalizations for populations are limited to those groups or subgroups with response rates of at least 30%.

What will be done with data from the results?

• The purpose of conducting the survey is to assess the campus climate for learning, working, and living at С��Ƭ��Ƶ and to identify successes and opportunities for improvement.
• The findings will serve as a guide when creating the action plan that accounts for the identified opportunities for improvement.
• Although the committee believes the survey process itself is informative, we have sought and received commitment from the senior leaders that data will be used to plan for an improved staff environment at С��Ƭ��Ƶ.

What is the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process for this study?

• Submitting the survey to the university's Institutional Review Board (IRB) is an important step of the campus climate study project. There are several benefits to going through this process, even if the survey is considered to be "exempt" or "not human subjects research." Firstly, it provides some assurance to potential participants that their responses to the survey will remain confidential. People who have participated in social science research may recognize and expect that the process has been reviewed by IRB. They may feel more comfortable sharing their confidential information and personal stories. Secondly, going through an IRB review provides some protections to the Principal Investigators (PIs) who will be entrusted with analyzing and managing the data, including both Rankin Climate and the institutional PIs. The expectation is that the data will not be shared with others, as designated in the data security plan. Lastly, an IRB review provides some cache to the study in the eyes of those who conduct research professionally, such as faculty members and scientists.  These individuals understand what an IRB review requires and the protections for the data to which research professionals commit. 
• The primary investigator from С��Ƭ��Ƶ for the IRB process is Dr. Linnea Stafford at С��Ƭ��Ƶ. An IRB application will be submitted for the project. Once the project is approved, the survey will be administered.

Do I have to take the survey?

• Participation in the survey is completely voluntary. Additionally, participants do not have to answer every question and can skip any questions they consider to be uncomfortable.

How is a respondent’s confidentiality protected?

• Confidentiality is vital to the success of campus climate research; particularly as sensitive and personal topics are discussed. While the survey cannot guarantee complete confidentiality because of the nature of multiple demographic questions, the consultant will take multiple precautionary measures to enhance individual confidentiality and the de-identification of data. No data already protected through regulation or policy (e.g., Social Security number, campus identification number, medical information) is obtained through the survey. In the event of any publication or presentation resulting from the assessment, no personally identifiable information will be shared.
• Confidentiality in participating will be maintained to the highest degree permitted by the technology used (e.g., IP addresses will be stripped when the survey is submitted). The survey is run  by RC via Qualtrics, whose servers are protected by high-end firewall systems and scans are performed regularly to ensure that any vulnerabilities are quickly found and patched. Qualtrics uses Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption (also known as HTTPS) to protect transmitted data. Access to RC surveys is restricted and audited for compliance. In addition, the external consultant (RC) will not report any group data for groups of fewer than five individuals, which may be small enough to compromise confidentiality. Instead, RC will combine the groups to eliminate any potential identifiable demographic information. Additionally, any comments submitted in response to the survey will be separated at the time of submission to the consultant so they are not attributed to any individual demographic characteristics. Identifiable information submitted in qualitative comments will be redacted and the college will only receive these redacted comments.
• Participation in the survey is completely voluntary, and participants do not have to answer any question and can skip any other questions they consider to be uncomfortable.
• Information in the introductory section of the survey will describe the manner in which confidentiality will be guaranteed, and additional communication to participants will provide expanded information on the nature of confidentiality, possible threats to confidentiality and procedures developed to ensure de-identification of data.

What protections are in place for storage of sensitive data, including for future secondary use?

• Rankin Climate uses a research data security description and protocol, which includes specific information on data encryption, the handling of personally identifiable information, physical security and a protocol for handling unlikely breaches of data security. The data from online participants will be submitted to a secure server hosted by the consultant. All Rankin Climate analysts have CITI (Human Subjects) training and approval and have worked on similar projects for other institutions.
• The consultant has conducted more than 300 institutional surveys and maintains an aggregate merged database. The data from the С��Ƭ��Ƶ project will be merged with all other existing campus data stored indefinitely on the consultant’s secure server. No institutional identifiers are included in the full merged data set held by the consultant. The raw unit-level data with institutional identifiers is kept on the server for six months and then destroyed. The consultant will notify the committee chairs of any breach or suspected breach of data security of the consultant’s server.
• The consultant will provide the primary investigator with a data file at the completion of the project.

How can I get involved?

• When we launch the survey in September, please fill out the survey and encourage your community to do the same!
• Spread the word and help us ensure that our community is involved in this entire process.
• Ensuring inclusive and equitable campus experiences for all staff members of the С��Ƭ��Ƶ community requires us to deeply listen and understand these often disparate experiences. You can help us gather voices!

Who’s on the committee?

• The full Working Group list can be found here: /voices/2024-climate-survey-working-group 

Why was an outside consultant used for this project?

• In reviewing efforts by other universities to conduct comprehensive culture climate studies, several best practices were identified. One was the need for external expertise in survey administration. The administration of a survey relating to a very sensitive subject like culture climate is likely to yield higher response rates and provide more credible findings if led by an independent, outside agency. Members of a college community may feel particularly inhibited to respond honestly to a survey administered by their own institution for fear of retaliation.

Why did the committee select Rankin Climate as their outside consultant?

• After a review of potential vendors, the Climate Survey Working Group selected Rankin Climate, LLC.
• Rankin Climate, LLC has been working with college campuses for over 20 years and has conducted similar assessments on more than 300 college campuses nationwide.
• Their process is highly confidential and transparent. No protected data is used in the project.

Where can I learn more?

• The website is the best place to learn more. You can find peer-reviewed research on campus climate, ways to get involved and more at www.kent.edu/voices.
• We will also be sending updates and invitations to get involved via email.